Cheap Symbolism

January 12th, 2011

Fake tank, 100% Design, London 2007.

I’ve been thinking about guns a lot since the shooting in Tucson of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and nineteen others on Saturday.   Clearly the shooter was deranged.  His kind of shooter, by definition, always is.   And whether or not the malevolent political climate is to blame, this massacre has focused attention on the emergence of the gun, especially high-powered automatic weapons, as the political symbol of choice on the right.

The fashion among Tea Partiers and their ilk for showing up at political rallies with their biggest guns on display is disturbing for a number of reasons.  First, there’s the implied threat; vote for our candidate or else… But more than that, all the gun waving strikes me as cheap symbolism, a time-tested shortcut for attracting attention.  So what, if you don’t have a coherent message?  Violence sells.  Ask Hollywood.  You don’t need a  plot to sell movie tickets as long as there’s lots of  shooting.  Ask video game manufacturers.  The gun waving wingnuts aren’t just making a statement about their Second Amendment rights.  They’re maximizing box office.  They’re inflating  the visibility  of otherwise utterly marginal politicians.

Over the past month or two, I’ve been reading a doorstop sized book called Faust’s Metropolis: A History of Berlin by Alexandra Richie.  It traces the city’s history from  the Middle Ages and ends in the 1990s.  On Saturday, as it happens, I was reading the section about how Hitler dispatched a young Joseph Goebbels to Berlin in 1926 to build support in Germany’s capital for the Nazi party.  At the time, there were only 200 party members in the city, as compared to 250,000 members of the Communist Party.   His very effective strategy was to attract attention by inciting violence,  specifically street brawls between his cadres and the Communists.  And also  to demonize the enemy: the Jews, the capitalists, and the Weimar government, which the Nazis painted as too weak to maintain order.     Goebbels in short:  to achieve power,  you incite violence and then assign blame.

So far, we’ve been luckier than the Weimar Germans.  The cheap symbolism  hasn’t been especially appealing to voters.  But it has made an impact on our political culture.  Whether or not the intensified gun waving of the past two years (and related acts of actual violence) influenced the kid in Tucson, the embrace of the automatic weapon as a political symbol makes it that much more frightening for elected officials to step up and do what needs to be done,  to restrict access to such weapons.

P.S. Maybe the best response to the cheap symbolism isn’t to ignore it or shout it down, but to subvert it.

P.P.S. Speaking of Joseph Goebbels, Sarah Palin just introduced the term “blood libel” into the debate.

Cheap symbolism, genuine sentiment.

A Moment of Silence

January 10th, 2011

It’s a)2011 or b)1973 (choose one)

January 6th, 2011

8House by Bjarke Ingels (BIG) in Orestad, outside Copenhagen, completed in 2010 (top).  The Embarcadero Hyatt by John Portman, in San Francisco, completed 1973 (above).

In November, I  paid a brief visit to Copenhagen.  On my way out of town, I stopped in on Orestad, a new city– projected population 20,000 –  being built along an equally new transit line not far from the airport.  Orestad includes a hotel  by Daniel Libeskind, a concert hall by Jean Nouvel, and several apartment blocks by Denmark’s emerging bad boy architect Bjarke Ingels (of BIG).

I especially wanted to see Ingels’ recently completed 8House, a jaggy bowtie shaped complex with apartments, offices and a sweet cafe, because of its most intriguing amenity,  a sloping path that goes from the building’s courtyard level to the top floors, allowing Copenhagen’s ardent bicyclists to pedal right to their doors.  It’s the Danish equivalent of that  Anabelle Selldorf building on Eleventh Avenue with the “en-suite sky garage” that allows condo owners to park directly outside their highrise apartments.

8House, which retools the geometry of courtyards to give everyone the best possible views and the most possible sunlight, made me very curious about what Ingels will be able to accomplish in New York.  His Orestad buildings (8House is his third) are the result of a unusually happy collaboration with a developer in a location where innovation and bold gestures are pretty much de rigueur.  Apparently, he’s planning something equally weird and angular for developer Douglas Durst’s site at the far west end of 57th St.  It  struck me as wildly unprecedented — and a little unlikely — until it dawned on me that 8House is  an indirect descendant of another weird and angular building, the John Portman designed Embarcadero Hyatt in San Francisco.  Could it be the 1970s all over again?

P.S. Oh yeah:  Happy New Year!!!

8House’s angular courtyard with the beginning of its signature bike ramp (top).  The Embarcadero Hyatt’s angular exterior (above).

How to Win Friends and Influence Canadians

December 14th, 2010

Canadian border installation by Seattle’s Lead Pencil Studio.

Wow.  What is this amazing object?  Mark Lamster explains over at Design Observer.   Beats the hell out of the weird object we’ve been erecting along that other border (see below).

Mexican border installation by US Customs and Border Protection. ( If only the Feds had hired Christo…) (Photo by James Reyes)

Regarding Austin

December 13th, 2010

Scenes from downtown Austin.  The Frost Bank tower is in the middle of the top photo.

My  Metropolis column about my recent visit to Austin is now online.

I’d just like to say, for the record, that I like Austin a lot.  I had a great time there.  And was impressed by, among other things, architect/builder Chris Krager’s new subdivision (more on this in the future) and the scene that’s sprung up east of I-35.

And it’s great  that the economy there is reasonably healthy.  But much of the growth that has occurred since my previous visit is strikingly generic.  Which makes me wonder if Austin is going to grow up to be Houston or Atlanta. Like, how can the distinctive culture of a city like Austin make it’s way into built form?

Homily

December 9th, 2010

A skylight at Louis Kahn’s Trenton Bath House.

From an essay by Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, daughter of Bobby Kennedy, former Lieutenant Governor of Maryland,  in the Washington Post called  What Palin Gets Wrong about JFK:

Palin fails to understand the genius of our nation. The United States is one of the most vibrant religious countries on Earth precisely because of its religious freedom. When power and faith are entwined, faith loses. Power tends to obfuscate, corrupt and focus on temporal rather than eternal purposes.

The whole essay is worth reading. As is Jeanne Devon’s ongoing explication of Sarah Palin’s new “book.”  And (my hero!) Aaron Sorkin’s evisceration of Palin’s “reality” show.

The photos above and below are from a bus trip I took last summer to see Louis Kahn’s famous Trenton Bath House, once the gateway to the Jewish Community Center’s swimming pool.  Newly restored, it will resume service as a bath house — the pool is now owned by Mercer County — and architectural pilgrimage site.

I chose the photo above because, while my relationship with religion and belief is strained…Actually, beyond strained.  There are moments when I at least grasp the concept of God.  And they always involve a simple building, like Kahn’s Bath House, designed by an architect who understands the ethereal nature of sunlight.   The photo above is my version of a homily.

P.S.  Another spot where I encountered that same weirdly inspiring interplay of sunlight, material, and space was  the Swedish architect Sigurd Lewerentz’s St. Marks Church in suburban Stockholm.  If you go to this website and scroll down to the photo at the bottom of the page, you’ll see what I mean.  What is it, I wonder, about a simple square of daylight that moves me so?

Worshiping Louis Kahn at the Trenton Bath House.

Murder in Utopia

December 4th, 2010

Celebration, Florida 2005

Reading the accounts of the recent crime wave in Celebration, Florida, I was reminded of my long dormant unfinished novel, Murder in Utopia, which takes place in a town called Happiness:


“There’s no such thing as innocence,” says Bob the Architect, as he pokes his index finger into the tranquil pale yellow waters of his third or fourth mug of beer.  I guess he’s testing the temperature, or maybe gauging the level of sudsyness.  I don’t know.  “No such thing,” he repeats, this time looking at me, crinkling the lines around his eyes a bit, raising his eyebrows a centimeter and smiling just slightly, the facial equivalent of a whisper.

I think of this as Bob’s client-face, the way he looked when he was seducing some magnate into believing that only he and Bob truly understood life’s mysteries.

Of course, by the time I met Bob, he no longer had clients.

“What do you mean?  What about children?  Aren’t they innocent?”  I took a sip of what had been a frozen margarita and was now just flavorless slush.

“Lucy,” he said, his smile more pronounced, his teeth showing.  “When I was a child, I wasn’t innocent….”

“When you were five years old?”

He fiddled for a moment with his severe, thick framed glasses, that were now held together on one side by a gold paper clip.

“When I was five years old, I’d bring my crayon drawings home from kindergarten to show my parents and I knew, even then I knew, that I should show them the better picture second, or even third, so that by the time they got to it they’d be surprised and delighted, pleased with themselves for uncovering my true talents.”

“Okay, how about when you were two?”

He didn’t answer.

Bob is the architect of Happiness.  That is to say, he built this place.  He designed the eight prototype houses, each representing a regional American house circa 1910.  He designed Happiness’s signature white picket fence with it’s slightly asymmetrical point, a detail that concerned no one aside from Bob’s fellow architects.  He designed the city hall which, I believe was copied from the courthouse in To Kill a Mockingbird. Except, because Happiness is a division of a corporation, rather than a real town, there’s nothing in the city hall except an office that dispenses visitor parking permits (residents get theirs in the mail) and a Starbucks.  And he drew up plans for Main Street which is a sweetened version of Morristown, New Jersey, where Bob grew up.

Bob designed this place, stayed for most of the construction process, until he was satisfied that every sprinkler head was properly placed and that every front gate was built so that a small child could swing on it and that the soda fountain looked just like Walters, where he used to get his chocolate ice cream sodas every Saturday.  And then he went home to New York City, back to his practice building office towers and 20,000 square foot beach cottages for hedge fund managers.

About three weeks after his return to New York, midway through a presentation to some cellular phone mogul regarding a new skyscraper that would look, Bob swore, identical to the RCA building, Bob stopped.  He just stopped.  He had never in his entire life been at a loss for words, but he just stared at his client, a weasel in Ferragamos, and couldn’t remember why he was talking to the man or what he was talking about.

Naturally, the client assumed that he was experiencing a dramatic pause.  After all, Bob the Architect had a reputation as a showman.  His presentations were theater.  He was just allowing anticipation to build between the mullions and the crenellations.

But after three long, exceptionally tense minutes Bob, who had suddenly abandoned his entire non-verbal repertoire — the eye-contact deployed like a weapon, the four different highly practiced types of smile, the hands that were as expressive as a hula dancers — stood up stiffly, and said, “I have to go home now.”

He packed an overnight bag with nothing more than some beach gear, a tooth brush and the copy of Moby Dick that he had been 16 pages into for nearly a decade, and returned to Happiness.  He moved into an apartment on Main Street in a building that was identical to the one his father owned, that Bob grew up in, but for the fact that the ground floor business was not plumbing supplies.  Instead it was a store that sold rainbow colored kites and scented soaps.

Bob was home.  He stopped practicing architecture.  He spent his days painting water colors, reading Melville;  by the time we became friends, he’d moved on to Typee.  And meeting me for Happiness Hour at the bar.  We became drinking buddies. But there was more to it than that. Specifically we met so Bob could tell me how badly I was doing my job.  He wanted me to be his enforcer.

See, I’m the Style Cop.  I patrol the sunny streets of Happiness, Florida,  citing violators of the homeowners’ covenant.  I keep a lookout for siding painted anything besides the four approved shades of white.  I check gardens for unauthorized flowers.  That’s my kind of police work.  That’s what I do.  But sometimes, I think homeowners let blue hydrangea grow where pink flowers are specified in the plans because they just don’t know.

“I don’t think they mean to screw up your plans,” I’m telling Bob.  “I think they just make innocent mistakes.”

“Lucy,” he says, “There’s no such thing as innocence.”

I wrote at some length about Happiness, having never been to Celebration until I went there on a New Urbanism roadtrip for Travel + Leisure magazine in late 2005.  The town itself was a disappointment, surely not Disney’s most convincing bit of  magic.   Not long before my arrival, Disney had  sold the  entire downtown –the Teddy Bear shop, the Denny’s disguised as a small town diner, etc. — to a firm called Lexin Capital.  Basically, if you can sell the entire business district as a unit, it can’t be a real town.

As for the recent events in Celebration, Bob the Architect knows whereof he speaks.

Notes on Beauty

November 4th, 2010

Beauty on Houston Street.

What can I say?  I’ve been busy.  Sometime back in September, my Metropolis column on urban beauty was published and I’ve been lost in a fog of aesthetic splendor since then. I’ve gone all Cinderella.  Suddenly, everything is beautiful.  Even the chronically distasteful corner of Houston and Lafayette has been graced by Beauty (courtesy of Calvin Klein).  Oh, yes.

(Okay, there was the election, and that was decidedly non-beautiful.)

And I spent a few days in Austin, Texas pontificating about beauty in a city that is something of an aesthetic refusnik. More on this in the December issue of Metropolis.

(Well, there is a very lovely glass- punctured wall by Lewis Tsurumaki Lewis at Austin’s newly rehabbed Arthouse at the Jones Center: see below.)

Since September,  I’ve accumulated a few beauty-related tidbits that I’ve been meaning to share.

First, I’ve been intending to plug Leonard Koren’s newest little book, which “aesthetics” do you mean?  ten definitions. Penelope Green profiled Leonard several weeks ago in the New York Times, which is probably why the book is now prominently placed near the cash register at McNally Jackson.  But I figured I should still add my two cents:  Leonard has an approach to aesthetics (in this book and others, like his take on Wabi- Sabi) that is at once off-kilter and wonderfully clear.  Reading him, I feel like a precocious child grasping a concept that I’d assumed was too adult for me.  This is a good feeling.  As is reading about aesthetics without having to wade through impenetrable jargon.

Second, my beauty essay attracted a lot of interesting email.  Rachel Berstone of an Australian publication called Steel Profile sent me a link to a blog called 52 Suburbs, in which a photographer tirelessly searches the Sydney hinterlands in search of beauty.    Christopher Hawthorne, architecture critic for the LA Times referred me to an old essay of his which is more about ugliness than beauty, but relevant nonetheless.  And swami of the Creative Class Richard Florida, pointed me to a study he helped design for Gallup called The Soul of the Community, in which they determined that “physical beauty” is one of the things that attaches people to their hometowns.

Florida, in his email, noted:

Cities really are more than economic structures or material structures. The way we perceive them really, really matters on a host of levels. And of the things we perceive beauty is the most fundamentally important, it appears.

And, just today, the beauty essay got a  shout out from Ada Louise Huxtable in her WSJ piece lamenting the removal of the Bertoia screen from the interior of the landmarked Manufacturers Hanover Trust building at Fifth Ave. and 43rd St.

Beauty in Austin, Texas courtesy of Lewis Tsurumaki Lewis.

Sign of the Times

September 22nd, 2010

Union picketers and extra-large bedbug, Fifth Ave. and 34th St., 9-22-10.

For years, construction trade unions have picketed non-union job sites  accompanied by a giant inflatable rat.  But today, in front of the tourist entrance to the Empire State Building, members of what I think is the glaziers union picket with their new mascot,  a jumbo, inflatable version of New York City’s current  it-vermin, the bedbug.  Tres chic, guys.

What I Saw in Chelsea (and points south)

September 15th, 2010

Barbara Kruger’s big words at the Whitney’s High Line construction site (top) and Marc Newson’s boy toys at Gagosian (above).

Gorgeous day yesterday.  Didn’t want to sit at my desk.  So I accepted an invitation to go to the press preview of designer Marc Newson’s exhibition, Transport.  It’s at the Gagosian Gallery on W. 21st St.  Initially I viewed it as a collection of planes that don’t fly,  boats that don’t float and  cars that don’t drive.  Which, I figured, makes them art rather than design.  Except that Newson’s boyish enthusiasm for aerodynamic form doesn’t lend itself to the critical viewpoint that art generally requires.  He’s no Damien Hirst.  But as it turns out, the boat, Aquariva, actually does float, and has been produced in a limited edition of 22 by the Italian Riva boatyards.  Asking price: $1.28 million.  So it actually is a design show.  And the Gagosian Gallery is  doubling as a boat showroom.  My mistake.  Now, if  the little jet, Kelvin40 (pictured above), could really fly, I’d be impressed.

From Gagosian, I resisted the urge to get on the subway and instead climbed up to the High Line and meandered south, enjoying the sun and noticing how the foliage around the re-installed railroad tracks was beginning to take on that lush, overgrown look that Joel Sternfeld captured in his old High Line photos.  At the south end of the park, I looked down at the site where the Whitney is building its new branch and was surprised and happy to see jumbo  words  everywhere.  It was, as I suspected, a new installation by artist Barbara Kruger.  Her art doesn’t float, fly, or drive, but she hasn’t lost the knack for putting her worldview right in your face.

P.S.  I have a new Metropolis column about urban beauty and a very profound new Travel + Leisure web feature called the World’s Coolest Observation Decks.  (There’s also an observation deck story in the October T+L, but that’s not online yet.)

P.P.S.  I own a Marc Newson-designed soap dish and it really does hold soap.